Two Heads Are Better Than One

 

    With the phrase: “Two head are better than one," I agree. It is more likely to come up with satisfactory plans or directions than just one head.

    For example, if my boss assigns me with a project, and gave me the choice of working alone or with a partner, I would choose with a partner. With more people to work on the project, the effort can be distributed and allows each other to have less of a workload. To me, taking a partner means that the two heads working on the project can cover more area of information than just one. After the rough draft of the report or slideshow is completed, two heads will also pick up more errors and lack of information in a particular section before it . Two brains can come up with more creative ideas of presenting the information of the work project.

    I have come across an issue that supports my opinion of “Two heads are better than one.” A couple weeks ago, my history teacher set us a project to build a medieval style castle, but with a different theme. After racking my brain, I came up with many ideas, like Star Wars, SpongeBob and Despicable Me. But none of them satisfied me. In the end, I chose to work with a partner. After another couple minutes of painful brainstorming, my partner advised me of the perfect idea: Harry Potter. Both of us absolutely loved the series, and we quickly agreed. Without the second head reaching a wider area of creativity, I would  have been stuck doing a bright yellow Despicable Me castle protected by jelly turrets.

    Although some might say there would be friction between the two heads, I think that’s a minor drawback. With much more creativity and much less work, I think two heads are definitely better than one.